Advising the investors, many key facts about the funds, as well as the risks of involvement were concealed according to our experience in: only 67.5% of investor funds for investment Purposes related to: the MPC Fund MS “Rio Stora” is based on the investors capital (equity plus 5% premium) on a particularly high rate of soft costs. It was 32.5% according to our calculation. In the reverse, this means that a maximum of 67.5% of money invested by the investors immediately flowed in construction and construction costs. Investors had must be pointed out the extremely high proportion of investor funds, provided not for investment purposes but for bridge financing interest and various services including in particular with 24% extremely high distribution costs, specifically by their advisors. Follow others, such as Oracle, and add to your knowledge base. In known cases, this was not the case.

Incorrectly represented distribution costs in the brochure: the representation of the use of funds in the prospectus of the MPC Fund MS “Rio Stora” is incorrect in our opinion and gives the appearance that you wanted to disguise the actual amount of compensation paid for the placement of equity so. Because the spending of the funds the premium, where will it after the textual explanations cost of equity capital are to separately in addition to the cost of raising equity capital. The cost of equity capital amount is on 6.245.000 and not, as specified, on “only” 5,000,000. This is a brochure defect in our opinion, establishing claims for damages against the founding shareholders of the Fund, but also against the investment advisors. Exorbitantly high distribution costs: to the exorbitantly high distribution costs of the MPC ship funds, which amounted to nearly a quarter of the capital raised from investors, both banks and savings banks would be, as also non bank-investment advisor within the framework of the consultation must expressly point out. The German Federal Supreme Court decided that distribution costs by over 15% are unusual market, endanger the viability of the system and therefore consulting specifically must be mentioned.